<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: But Who Are We Replacing?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://squarezero.org/2008-0331/but-who-are-we-replacing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://squarezero.org/2008-0331/but-who-are-we-replacing/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 23:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lexington Green</title>
		<link>http://squarezero.org/2008-0331/but-who-are-we-replacing/#comment-62901</link>
		<dc:creator>Lexington Green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 20:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://squarezero.org/2008-0331/but-who-are-we-replacing/#comment-62901</guid>
		<description>Great photo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great photo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Father Joe</title>
		<link>http://squarezero.org/2008-0331/but-who-are-we-replacing/#comment-61557</link>
		<dc:creator>Father Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 20:22:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://squarezero.org/2008-0331/but-who-are-we-replacing/#comment-61557</guid>
		<description>You have beautiful children.  They are a wonderful testimony of love and the sanctity of life.  God bless!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have beautiful children.  They are a wonderful testimony of love and the sanctity of life.  God bless!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://squarezero.org/2008-0331/but-who-are-we-replacing/#comment-58565</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 20:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://squarezero.org/2008-0331/but-who-are-we-replacing/#comment-58565</guid>
		<description>Alex&#8212;Thanks for dropping by.

Sorry about the "radical feminist" thing. You do call yourself a feminist, and from where I'm sitting your views are pretty radical, but I don't see where it helps to use polarizing language like that.

On adoption&#8212;what a breathtaking non sequitur! I dispute the notion that there are insufficient numbers of adoptive parents, and it follows that my eight children must have been adopted?

I suppose it's pretty clear from the photo that my kids are not adopted. But what's it to you?

That's my point: you claim to advocate reproductive freedom of choice, and clearly resent any criticism of your own choices in that regard&#8212;yet feel free to characterize my reproductive choices as "beyond irresponsible".

That sounds just a little bit hypocritical to me.

Nor did I say anything about your decision not to have children being "selfish". I &lt;em&gt;did&lt;/em&gt; say that you've made that decision without regard to the "replacement rate"&#8212;the  criterion upon which you based your original criticism of my family size.

As to the world's "fast diminishing resources"&#8212;and the inferences you draw about how this impacts needy children&#8212;check out Jeff Jacoby's &lt;a href="http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2008/06/18/the_coming_population_bust/" rel="nofollow"&gt;column &lt;/a&gt; in the &lt;cite&gt;Boston Globe&lt;/cite&gt; earlier this week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex&mdash;Thanks for dropping by.</p>
<p>Sorry about the &#8220;radical feminist&#8221; thing. You do call yourself a feminist, and from where I&#8217;m sitting your views are pretty radical, but I don&#8217;t see where it helps to use polarizing language like that.</p>
<p>On adoption&mdash;what a breathtaking non sequitur! I dispute the notion that there are insufficient numbers of adoptive parents, and it follows that my eight children must have been adopted?</p>
<p>I suppose it&#8217;s pretty clear from the photo that my kids are not adopted. But what&#8217;s it to you?</p>
<p>That&#8217;s my point: you claim to advocate reproductive freedom of choice, and clearly resent any criticism of your own choices in that regard&mdash;yet feel free to characterize my reproductive choices as &#8220;beyond irresponsible&#8221;.</p>
<p>That sounds just a little bit hypocritical to me.</p>
<p>Nor did I say anything about your decision not to have children being &#8220;selfish&#8221;. I <em>did</em> say that you&#8217;ve made that decision without regard to the &#8220;replacement rate&#8221;&mdash;the  criterion upon which you based your original criticism of my family size.</p>
<p>As to the world&#8217;s &#8220;fast diminishing resources&#8221;&mdash;and the inferences you draw about how this impacts needy children&mdash;check out Jeff Jacoby&#8217;s <a href="http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2008/06/18/the_coming_population_bust/" rel="nofollow">column </a> in the <cite>Boston Globe</cite> earlier this week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Remy</title>
		<link>http://squarezero.org/2008-0331/but-who-are-we-replacing/#comment-58528</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Remy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 22:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://squarezero.org/2008-0331/but-who-are-we-replacing/#comment-58528</guid>
		<description>Eric, 

I am happy to see you got a chance to visit my website, and I'm gratified to learn that you enjoyed my art. A few points regarding this post: 

1. As my "about" page states, I am not a radical feminist. I understand you have since amended this word choice, but my technorati page shows the original context, so I wanted to make that point transparent. 

2. You dismissed my criticism that most parents are unwilling to adopt. Am I correct to assume, then, that your eight children are adopted?

3. If this is not the case, it appears your children are a surplus in an already overpopulated world. With thousands upon thousands of children living in tragic foster care conditions, waiting to be adopted, the decision to have large families in the modern climate is beyond irresponsible. My sympathies lie with those children who have been born, only to be discarded.

I understand you do not respect my life choices, and I assure you, the sentiment is reciprocated. You believe my decision not to have children is selfish. However, I know it is a wise choice, made by a loving couple who seeks to improve the world in ways that do not involve straining it's fast diminishing resources. 

And on that note, we must agree to staunchly disagree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric, </p>
<p>I am happy to see you got a chance to visit my website, and I&#8217;m gratified to learn that you enjoyed my art. A few points regarding this post: </p>
<p>1. As my &#8220;about&#8221; page states, I am not a radical feminist. I understand you have since amended this word choice, but my technorati page shows the original context, so I wanted to make that point transparent. </p>
<p>2. You dismissed my criticism that most parents are unwilling to adopt. Am I correct to assume, then, that your eight children are adopted?</p>
<p>3. If this is not the case, it appears your children are a surplus in an already overpopulated world. With thousands upon thousands of children living in tragic foster care conditions, waiting to be adopted, the decision to have large families in the modern climate is beyond irresponsible. My sympathies lie with those children who have been born, only to be discarded.</p>
<p>I understand you do not respect my life choices, and I assure you, the sentiment is reciprocated. You believe my decision not to have children is selfish. However, I know it is a wise choice, made by a loving couple who seeks to improve the world in ways that do not involve straining it&#8217;s fast diminishing resources. </p>
<p>And on that note, we must agree to staunchly disagree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cure of Ars</title>
		<link>http://squarezero.org/2008-0331/but-who-are-we-replacing/#comment-57528</link>
		<dc:creator>Cure of Ars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 14:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://squarezero.org/2008-0331/but-who-are-we-replacing/#comment-57528</guid>
		<description>Only way that pro-abortion people can make their case is by playing with the meaning of words and this only works on a superficial level.  Throwing the word "choice" around when women usually only have abortions is when they feel like they don't have a choice doesn't cut it.  With ultrasound, the psychological damage abortion does to women, and pro-life people having more children, abortions days are numbered.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only way that pro-abortion people can make their case is by playing with the meaning of words and this only works on a superficial level.  Throwing the word &#8220;choice&#8221; around when women usually only have abortions is when they feel like they don&#8217;t have a choice doesn&#8217;t cut it.  With ultrasound, the psychological damage abortion does to women, and pro-life people having more children, abortions days are numbered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lawrence Leach   (In Gods Image)</title>
		<link>http://squarezero.org/2008-0331/but-who-are-we-replacing/#comment-56646</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawrence Leach   (In Gods Image)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 20:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://squarezero.org/2008-0331/but-who-are-we-replacing/#comment-56646</guid>
		<description>You can find information and Fr. Frank Pavone's You Tube Video, on Abortion,  You can also find Silent no More, and other Pro-life Ministries there on our Myspace Site.
Thank you for all you do for Pro-life.  These are some links to our music on the Internet. 
www.cdbaby.com/InGodsimage
Audio Lunchbox  
FaithMP3 
Apple iTunes 
BuyMusic 
QtrNote 
GreatIndieMusic 
PayPlay 
GroupieTunes



Remember All Life is Precious, Born &#38; Unborn!! 

Lawrence &#38; DianeMarie Leach (In God's Image) 
Go to our www.myspace.com/InGodsimagemusic
or our www.soundclick.com/InGodsimage
or our www.shoutlife.com/InGodsimagemusic
Websites and click on button for the Word of Promise Bible, 
and support our music ministry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can find information and Fr. Frank Pavone&#8217;s You Tube Video, on Abortion,  You can also find Silent no More, and other Pro-life Ministries there on our Myspace Site.<br />
Thank you for all you do for Pro-life.  These are some links to our music on the Internet.<br />
<a href="http://www.cdbaby.com/InGodsimage" rel="nofollow">http://www.cdbaby.com/InGodsimage</a><br />
Audio Lunchbox<br />
FaithMP3<br />
Apple iTunes<br />
BuyMusic<br />
QtrNote<br />
GreatIndieMusic<br />
PayPlay<br />
GroupieTunes</p>
<p>Remember All Life is Precious, Born &amp; Unborn!! </p>
<p>Lawrence &amp; DianeMarie Leach (In God&#8217;s Image)<br />
Go to our <a href="http://www.myspace.com/InGodsimagemusic" rel="nofollow">http://www.myspace.com/InGodsimagemusic</a><br />
or our <a href="http://www.soundclick.com/InGodsimage" rel="nofollow">http://www.soundclick.com/InGodsimage</a><br />
or our <a href="http://www.shoutlife.com/InGodsimagemusic" rel="nofollow">http://www.shoutlife.com/InGodsimagemusic</a><br />
Websites and click on button for the Word of Promise Bible,<br />
and support our music ministry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://squarezero.org/2008-0331/but-who-are-we-replacing/#comment-53369</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 15:13:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://squarezero.org/2008-0331/but-who-are-we-replacing/#comment-53369</guid>
		<description>I knew that I could have phrased that sentence better . . . "It's ironic that those OSTENSIBLY best equipped to support children are often those most reluctant to have children."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I knew that I could have phrased that sentence better . . . &#8220;It&#8217;s ironic that those OSTENSIBLY best equipped to support children are often those most reluctant to have children.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://squarezero.org/2008-0331/but-who-are-we-replacing/#comment-53368</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 14:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://squarezero.org/2008-0331/but-who-are-we-replacing/#comment-53368</guid>
		<description>Annie, Karen, Brian and John&#8212;

Thanks for your comments.

&lt;strong&gt;Annie:&lt;/strong&gt; Sarah gets cuter every day. I swear she's starting to say "hi" to me!

&lt;strong&gt;Karen:&lt;/strong&gt; I am indeed pleased to find the pro-choice crowd so troubled by the bounty of our family.

&lt;strong&gt;Brian:&lt;/strong&gt; Turns out "those best equipped to support children" are not those blessed with material wealth&#8212;for many of whom that blessing becomes a curse.

&lt;strong&gt;John:&lt;/strong&gt; Thanks! We have a lot of fun together. My kids are some of the coolest people I've ever met.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Annie, Karen, Brian and John&mdash;</p>
<p>Thanks for your comments.</p>
<p><strong>Annie:</strong> Sarah gets cuter every day. I swear she&#8217;s starting to say &#8220;hi&#8221; to me!</p>
<p><strong>Karen:</strong> I am indeed pleased to find the pro-choice crowd so troubled by the bounty of our family.</p>
<p><strong>Brian:</strong> Turns out &#8220;those best equipped to support children&#8221; are not those blessed with material wealth&mdash;for many of whom that blessing becomes a curse.</p>
<p><strong>John:</strong> Thanks! We have a lot of fun together. My kids are some of the coolest people I&#8217;ve ever met.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Bowden</title>
		<link>http://squarezero.org/2008-0331/but-who-are-we-replacing/#comment-53340</link>
		<dc:creator>John Bowden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 02:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://squarezero.org/2008-0331/but-who-are-we-replacing/#comment-53340</guid>
		<description>and what a beautiful family!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and what a beautiful family!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://squarezero.org/2008-0331/but-who-are-we-replacing/#comment-53287</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 04:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://squarezero.org/2008-0331/but-who-are-we-replacing/#comment-53287</guid>
		<description>I've been thinking about demographics lately so it was nice to stumble over here.  Secularists have a tough time reproducing, which is why you see Europe dying a sad slow death.  My secular friends have no kids.  This is a sad, sad thing for our country because they (and many like them) are extremely intelligent, overly educated, and good people.  It's ironic that those best equipped to support children are often those most reluctant to have children.  But if your purpose in life is your self-satisfaction, it appears more fulfilling to be free to be able to go out every Friday and Saturday with no responsibilities.  Of course, when you're fifty and alone, you'll live with that choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been thinking about demographics lately so it was nice to stumble over here.  Secularists have a tough time reproducing, which is why you see Europe dying a sad slow death.  My secular friends have no kids.  This is a sad, sad thing for our country because they (and many like them) are extremely intelligent, overly educated, and good people.  It&#8217;s ironic that those best equipped to support children are often those most reluctant to have children.  But if your purpose in life is your self-satisfaction, it appears more fulfilling to be free to be able to go out every Friday and Saturday with no responsibilities.  Of course, when you&#8217;re fifty and alone, you&#8217;ll live with that choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
