<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Boys and Girls at Play</title>
	<atom:link href="http://squarezero.org/2007/at-play/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://squarezero.org/2007/at-play/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 21:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: cest.la.vie</title>
		<link>http://squarezero.org/2007/at-play/comment-page-1/#comment-36467</link>
		<dc:creator>cest.la.vie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 21:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://squarezero.org/2007-0328/at-play/#comment-36467</guid>
		<description>I'm glad all your children fit into neat little gender-stereotyped boxes. That must be nice for you. 

Out here, however, there are children with a variety of interests. My husband played with dolls, and not in a militaristic fashion. I always craved legos and made the most out of tinker toys. However, he also played with legos, and I also played with dolls. Shockingly, our interests covered a large, multi-faceted spectrum. 

Most children I know are capable of enjoying different toys, but when their parents indicate that they "should" be playing a certain way, their pre-conditioned peers indicate they "should" be playing with certain items, and societal messages indicate that they "should" behave according to fabricated standards, children (who tend to be rather impressionable) are typically eager to comply. 

If you would spend a little time in a non-religious pre-school classroom, I think you would recognize the fallacy in your "all girls play with dolls, all boys want guns" generalization.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad all your children fit into neat little gender-stereotyped boxes. That must be nice for you. </p>
<p>Out here, however, there are children with a variety of interests. My husband played with dolls, and not in a militaristic fashion. I always craved legos and made the most out of tinker toys. However, he also played with legos, and I also played with dolls. Shockingly, our interests covered a large, multi-faceted spectrum. </p>
<p>Most children I know are capable of enjoying different toys, but when their parents indicate that they &#8220;should&#8221; be playing a certain way, their pre-conditioned peers indicate they &#8220;should&#8221; be playing with certain items, and societal messages indicate that they &#8220;should&#8221; behave according to fabricated standards, children (who tend to be rather impressionable) are typically eager to comply. </p>
<p>If you would spend a little time in a non-religious pre-school classroom, I think you would recognize the fallacy in your &#8220;all girls play with dolls, all boys want guns&#8221; generalization.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://squarezero.org/2007/at-play/comment-page-1/#comment-16844</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 16:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://squarezero.org/2007-0328/at-play/#comment-16844</guid>
		<description>Mary Ann&#8212;We must be cousins of some kind. My grandfather, Matthias Herman Scheidler, was born in Millhousen, IN. His father was named John Baptist, and &lt;em&gt;his&lt;/em&gt; father was Johann Scheidler from Bavaria, who married Kunegunda Steger (they met in Cincinnati)&#8212;my great-great grandparents. I've seen their graves in Millhousen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mary Ann&mdash;We must be cousins of some kind. My grandfather, Matthias Herman Scheidler, was born in Millhousen, IN. His father was named John Baptist, and <em>his</em> father was Johann Scheidler from Bavaria, who married Kunegunda Steger (they met in Cincinnati)&mdash;my great-great grandparents. I&#8217;ve seen their graves in Millhousen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Ann</title>
		<link>http://squarezero.org/2007/at-play/comment-page-1/#comment-16838</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Ann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 15:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://squarezero.org/2007-0328/at-play/#comment-16838</guid>
		<description>While conducting a search for articles pertaining to dolls, I came upon yours--compliment first:  lovely and entertaining insight.

When I tracked it back, and found your sir name, I was thrilled to find it as my maiden name.  My father was a native of Millhousen, IN.  Small world -- make that, wonderful small world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While conducting a search for articles pertaining to dolls, I came upon yours&#8211;compliment first:  lovely and entertaining insight.</p>
<p>When I tracked it back, and found your sir name, I was thrilled to find it as my maiden name.  My father was a native of Millhousen, IN.  Small world &#8212; make that, wonderful small world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JACK</title>
		<link>http://squarezero.org/2007/at-play/comment-page-1/#comment-12912</link>
		<dc:creator>JACK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 04:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://squarezero.org/2007-0328/at-play/#comment-12912</guid>
		<description>Interesting post.  I asked for a few dolls when I was a young boy.  My parents had no problem with it at all and gave them to me.  Did I dress them up?  Nope.  They conducted military campaigns with the vehicles I built out of Legos (and had military code names to boot).  And when they weren't conducting military campaigns, they were master businessmen.  My cabbage patch kid was named Reuben and I, of course, bragged to my brother about how Reuben was a billionaire, having invented the sandwich of the same name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post.  I asked for a few dolls when I was a young boy.  My parents had no problem with it at all and gave them to me.  Did I dress them up?  Nope.  They conducted military campaigns with the vehicles I built out of Legos (and had military code names to boot).  And when they weren&#8217;t conducting military campaigns, they were master businessmen.  My cabbage patch kid was named Reuben and I, of course, bragged to my brother about how Reuben was a billionaire, having invented the sandwich of the same name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen</title>
		<link>http://squarezero.org/2007/at-play/comment-page-1/#comment-12911</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 03:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://squarezero.org/2007-0328/at-play/#comment-12911</guid>
		<description>By the way, congratulations on Number Eight!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, congratulations on Number Eight!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen</title>
		<link>http://squarezero.org/2007/at-play/comment-page-1/#comment-12910</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 03:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://squarezero.org/2007-0328/at-play/#comment-12910</guid>
		<description>Hi Eric! I'm finally able to access your site again. Still don't know what happened, but apparently the problem is fixed...

A blessed Pascha to you. Christ is risen!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Eric! I&#8217;m finally able to access your site again. Still don&#8217;t know what happened, but apparently the problem is fixed&#8230;</p>
<p>A blessed Pascha to you. Christ is risen!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james</title>
		<link>http://squarezero.org/2007/at-play/comment-page-1/#comment-12871</link>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 16:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://squarezero.org/2007-0328/at-play/#comment-12871</guid>
		<description>Hi eric - happy Easter.  Just tagged you on my blog.  Take a look...  Blessings, James.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi eric - happy Easter.  Just tagged you on my blog.  Take a look&#8230;  Blessings, James.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://squarezero.org/2007/at-play/comment-page-1/#comment-11419</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 03:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://squarezero.org/2007-0328/at-play/#comment-11419</guid>
		<description>Well sheesh, Eric.  Now that you've made the comparison to "little baby" I retract my comment and apologize.

Babies evidently come in little and big and it thus plain to me that neither is one homunculus exactly the size of another.

As such, it seems now entirely reasonable of you to have classified the larger body of variously-sized homunculi into "big homunculi" and "little homunculi", if only in the interests of clarity and brevity.

My comment was hasty and ill-considered.  Had I then the broad understanding of homunculi that I have now, I would not have left it.  Please forgive me and accept my best wishes for a blessed lent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well sheesh, Eric.  Now that you&#8217;ve made the comparison to &#8220;little baby&#8221; I retract my comment and apologize.</p>
<p>Babies evidently come in little and big and it thus plain to me that neither is one homunculus exactly the size of another.</p>
<p>As such, it seems now entirely reasonable of you to have classified the larger body of variously-sized homunculi into &#8220;big homunculi&#8221; and &#8220;little homunculi&#8221;, if only in the interests of clarity and brevity.</p>
<p>My comment was hasty and ill-considered.  Had I then the broad understanding of homunculi that I have now, I would not have left it.  Please forgive me and accept my best wishes for a blessed lent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Annie</title>
		<link>http://squarezero.org/2007/at-play/comment-page-1/#comment-11307</link>
		<dc:creator>Annie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 18:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://squarezero.org/2007-0328/at-play/#comment-11307</guid>
		<description>While reading Les Miserables, I came across a quote which stuck me.  I am happy you blogged on this, Eric, because I wanted to share this quote somewhere and you have allowed me the opportunity.

"The doll is one the most charming instincts of female childhood.  To care for, to clothe, to adorn, to dress, to undress, to dress over again, to teach, to scold a little, to rock, to cuddle, to put to sleep, to imagine that something is somebody - all the future of woman is there.  Even while musing and prattling, while making little wardrobes and little baby-clothes, while sewing little dresses, little bodices, and little jackets, the child becomes a little girl, and the little girl becomes a great girl, and the great girl becomes a woman.  The first baby takes the place of the first doll."

I'm the sister who turned everything into a baby.  And my little girl does the same thing.  She even cradled a pickle spear!  Little girls do love their dolls (but we call then babies)!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While reading Les Miserables, I came across a quote which stuck me.  I am happy you blogged on this, Eric, because I wanted to share this quote somewhere and you have allowed me the opportunity.</p>
<p>&#8220;The doll is one the most charming instincts of female childhood.  To care for, to clothe, to adorn, to dress, to undress, to dress over again, to teach, to scold a little, to rock, to cuddle, to put to sleep, to imagine that something is somebody - all the future of woman is there.  Even while musing and prattling, while making little wardrobes and little baby-clothes, while sewing little dresses, little bodices, and little jackets, the child becomes a little girl, and the little girl becomes a great girl, and the great girl becomes a woman.  The first baby takes the place of the first doll.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m the sister who turned everything into a baby.  And my little girl does the same thing.  She even cradled a pickle spear!  Little girls do love their dolls (but we call then babies)!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://squarezero.org/2007/at-play/comment-page-1/#comment-10921</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 14:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://squarezero.org/2007-0328/at-play/#comment-10921</guid>
		<description>I regret, oh my scholarly pal, that I did not submit my little essay on boys and girls at play to you for inspection prior to publication. However, I rejoice that this one small phrase alone demanded public correction.

You are right: "little homunculi" is redundant (rather like "little baby"), but the word "homunculi" seemed to require some kind of modifier, being so unfamiliar a word to readers of less accomplishment than yourself.

And so I have transformed the "little homunculi"&#8212;poor things&#8212;into the more alliterative "helpless homunculi," which I hope will meet with your approval, or at least with an absence of scorn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I regret, oh my scholarly pal, that I did not submit my little essay on boys and girls at play to you for inspection prior to publication. However, I rejoice that this one small phrase alone demanded public correction.</p>
<p>You are right: &#8220;little homunculi&#8221; is redundant (rather like &#8220;little baby&#8221;), but the word &#8220;homunculi&#8221; seemed to require some kind of modifier, being so unfamiliar a word to readers of less accomplishment than yourself.</p>
<p>And so I have transformed the &#8220;little homunculi&#8221;&mdash;poor things&mdash;into the more alliterative &#8220;helpless homunculi,&#8221; which I hope will meet with your approval, or at least with an absence of scorn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
