<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Saying &#8220;No&#8221; with Your Bodies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://squarezero.org/2006/saying-no-with-your-bodies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://squarezero.org/2006/saying-no-with-your-bodies/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 09:09:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://squarezero.org/2006/saying-no-with-your-bodies/comment-page-1/#comment-416</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2006 19:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://squarezero.org/2006-0501/saying-no-with-your-bodies/#comment-416</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Guest says: This is the most logical way I’ve heard this put. Only thing is I disagree that it is always wrong to say “no” to children . . .&quot;&lt;/strong&gt;

That really depends on what you mean by &quot;no.&quot; If your &quot;no&quot; is so absolute that you would even go so far as to abort a baby that was conceived when you were trying to avoid pregnancy, that&#039;s wrong.

If your &quot;no&quot; isn&#039;t that absolute, then probably you mean something more along the lines of &quot;not now, please.&quot; Remember that it isn&#039;t just the &quot;potential&quot; child you&#039;re saying &quot;no&quot; to&#8212;it&#039;s God. Since His providence can upset our plans and schemes, we ought to be careful saying &quot;no&quot; to him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Guest says: This is the most logical way I’ve heard this put. Only thing is I disagree that it is always wrong to say “no” to children . . .&#8221;</strong></p>
<p>That really depends on what you mean by &#8220;no.&#8221; If your &#8220;no&#8221; is so absolute that you would even go so far as to abort a baby that was conceived when you were trying to avoid pregnancy, that&#8217;s wrong.</p>
<p>If your &#8220;no&#8221; isn&#8217;t that absolute, then probably you mean something more along the lines of &#8220;not now, please.&#8221; Remember that it isn&#8217;t just the &#8220;potential&#8221; child you&#8217;re saying &#8220;no&#8221; to&mdash;it&#8217;s God. Since His providence can upset our plans and schemes, we ought to be careful saying &#8220;no&#8221; to him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://squarezero.org/2006/saying-no-with-your-bodies/comment-page-1/#comment-415</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2006 18:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://squarezero.org/2006-0501/saying-no-with-your-bodies/#comment-415</guid>
		<description>This is the most logical way I&#039;ve heard this put. Only thing is I disagree that it is always wrong to say &quot;no&quot; to children, but then again I&#039;m not Catholic. Otherwise good. Most pieces that try to explain this claim that the folks involved have weak marriages, or don&#039;t value life at all. You did it without putting anyone down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the most logical way I&#8217;ve heard this put. Only thing is I disagree that it is always wrong to say &#8220;no&#8221; to children, but then again I&#8217;m not Catholic. Otherwise good. Most pieces that try to explain this claim that the folks involved have weak marriages, or don&#8217;t value life at all. You did it without putting anyone down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

